QG services
Geostatistics
Resources & Reserves
Reconciliation & Grade Control
Audit & Due Diligence
Strategic Mine Planning
Geometallurgical Modelling
Training
Mine Geology
   
 
  Last Updated
24th November 2008
contact the web-master
services > conditional simulation & risk

Project economics, especially at early stages when only resource drilling is available, are often highly sensitive to both grade and tonnage. There are consequently two significant risks on resource quantification: (1) risk on tonnage ("geological risk"); and (2) risk on grade ("geostatistical risk").

Geological risk

Much of the work done in recent times on risk, using geostatistical simulation tools, has neglected to allow for the inherent geometric risks. In other words there has been sole focus on grade simulation.

The degrees of freedom inherent in a geological model may considered to be potentially high because of wide drill spacing or potential structural complexity. To quantify geological risk requires close collaborative work between project geologists and geologically trained, experienced geostatisticians. It may be possible to generate a range of 'plausible;' geological models (all consistent with the base data).

For example, QG have helped clients generate three plausible, different models, with the resultant geometries labelled as ‘Pessimistic’, ‘Median’ and ‘Optimistic’ cases. These cases can be used to generate volumes within which simulated grade distributions (from conditional simulations) can be assessed.

Geostatistical risk

Conditional simulation (CS) has gained in popularity in recent times, as computer speeds have exponentially climbed. These tools are effectively 'spatial Monte Carlo' approaches, and they offer enormous power in several areas of application:
  • Risk analysis (generate many images of the mineralisation and evaluate risk)

  • Confidence Intervals (an extension of the idea of risk analysis)

  • Recoverable Resource estimation: especially in the bivariate case (gold-copper, etc.) where the 'joint distribution' must be estimated

  • Bench-height and other selectivity studies

  • Multivariate recoverable resource estimation (by conditional cosimulation)

  • Evaluation of drill-spacing ('estimation variance study')

  • Change of support

  • Grade control (by economic optimisation)

It is interesting to note that, while there are many applications of CS, many users are not clear about these methods, and many applications are not driven by clear goals.

Putting it all together

QG can help to put conditional simulation tools to proper use, since they have:
Software tools

QG use Isatis software and can arrange a trial of this excellent geostatistical package for you.

Click here for more information on Isatis.

Other sources of simulation software include the GSLIB system.
 
go to top

Scott Jackson (left), Scott Dunham (centre), and John Vann (right) are the Directors of Quantitative Group
 

search web QG